AlteredUnity's successful ZPM replication

  • 3.7K Views
  • Last Post 23 October 2023
  • Topic Is Solved
AlteredUnity posted this 16 January 2023

Hey everyone, im glad you started a new community, its a shame your device went from "should be first device to replicate after Non-inductive coil" to a toy, to deleted.

300Turn coil : measurements were made with both coils on center of core at 1khz; Coils were then put at far opposite ends of top and bottom of core.

20awg;  L = 425mH; DCR = 1.73 ohms

150Turn coil : 20awg; L = 110.7mH; DCR = 0.818 ohms

This is a fast trial run, have more to come with some ideas that may improve opperation. With this configureation I still pull 7 watts of power, so there isn't a whole lot of feedback. 

The center tap is connected to cable running to my cars body ground; The scope is connected across load, with its ground on the DRAIN of mosfet. This may be the wrong configuration and reason for not lowering input.

Any pointers are appreciated.

beyond-unity zpm

Attached Files

cd_sharp posted this 04 June 2023

Hey, guys, I spent a lot of time investigating CW-CCW configuration. If the device has a closed core, like ZPM, there is no way to make the coils interact in CW-CCW. It is all about the A-vector which is a circular vector around the core and needs to add, not cancel. Stay strong!

If you know how to build such a device and you're not sharing, you're a schmuck! - Graham Gunderson

Fighter posted this 04 June 2023

Quoting:AlteredUnity

I will get rid of everything that's just adding unnecessary complexities when I haven't fully got the effects yet or at least to a degree that is unquestionable.

Yes, just temporarily until we figure out what's blocking the effect.

Then you may add anything back in the circuit one by one and see after each addition if the input decreasing effect is still present or not. That way by checking device's behavior is easy to find out which addition is messing with your ZPM's functionality.

You're welcome, I hope this helps.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
Fighter posted this 05 June 2023

Quoting:cd_sharp

If the device has a closed core, like ZPM, there is no way to make the coils interact in CW-CCW. It is all about the A-vector which is a circular vector around the core and needs to add, not cancel.

Yes, CW-CCW like how those so-called "partnered output coils" are shown on the old aboveunity site are not working. If that configuration would work at least one researcher would've been able to present a demo device showing at least some small overunity characteristics since 2017 when the site came online.

Those coils are just a part of one of Don Smith's devices and in my opinion they couldn't work without the rest of that device. Not even tallking about the fact that in Don Smith's device they are used with high-voltage.

Quoting a fragment from one of my posts in the public answer thread:

He just took half of one of Don Smith's devices and pretended it's his discovery. The fact that he disinformed from the beginning is proved by the fact that he "forgot" a key part there: the ground connection ("the source of electrons" how Don Smith calls it). Does it look familiar to you ?

Here it is, this is the explanation why after 5 years nobody there succeeded to build a functional device using "his" partnered output coils. Because it's a road going to nowhere.

About ZPM, as I presented here, the coils are CW-CW and they are connected to each other as presented in the drawings there.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
AlteredUnity posted this 01 July 2023

Just received a new MicSig CP1200A 800khz AC/DC current probe, and am very impressed with it. It also speeds up configuring measurements a lot easier.

 

I dont have a lot of time so I will only post pictures from schematic provided. You will notice my current probe was placed on the positive side of the load. The "negative" side is where I clipped an external ground. If I place the probe after the GND, the ZPM waveform is gone. When I moved probe to other side you can see the waveform.

I also noticed when the PS side is grounded, the input goes down a few hundred mA, though my measurements no matter how much i play with it, using normal probes it shows Math(avg) = -31W, i will post pictures of this when i have time.

I hope I got the following measurements correct, let  me know if you see anything that should be altered, any feedback is appreciated.

Schematic: For input and ouput measurement configurations - I am using a Differential Probe for V and Current Probe for I -

Input(Signal generator, scope(detail), scope(waveform): 

Ouput(Scope(detailed), Scope(Waveforms):

 

 

PS/Setup:

 

Still a lot to improve, connections, try other loads etc. I've gotten better results but not a lot of time to document as I go, so will try to get my input down farther(which i have at higher frequencies), along with changing other parameters, because there is still a lot of input being used.

 

I have yet to rewind my smaller coil, so hopefully will have that finished this weekend, hopefully will solve the problem.

Will recalibrate all my equipment and remeasure just in case along with finding better frequencies, just wanted to post some pics with new equipment. And the anomaly where the sine wave appears where gnd is connected, even so on the input i get simalar waveform when PS is grounded.

Fighter posted this 02 July 2023

Hi AlteredUnity,

The frequency seems too low, under 80 KHz my both ZPMs consumptions are also rising fast, going to around 1A as I lower the frequency more.

will try to get my input down farther(which i have at higher frequencies)

Does the frequency sweep work ?

Try to find the optimal/resonance frequency of your ZPM, it's variable and it depends on the duty-cycle and the load but it should be much higher.

Also, if possible, try to rise the voltage from 18V to 25V, that's the value I use with my both ZPMs.

With the higher voltage it should allow both opposing magnetic fields tu build up faster in the 18% duty-cycle. Maybe go with higher duty-cycle, 25% like I usually do ?

Very nice and clean/organized experiments table and equipment, I like it. 🙂

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
AlteredUnity posted this 02 July 2023

Thank you, i just bought new cable and banana plugs to organize it better. Hopefully will have time to do full sweep and operation, I manually swept, but if I go too high in frequency I don't get the waveform, but regardless of frequency it always looks as if the on time pulse is a lot stronger than what's being fed in, so I'm sure once I get the coils exchanging properly there'll be a lot more power that can be extracted.

I procrastinate way too much and just need to wind my smaller coil in the correct direction.

Also, for some reason when measuring the input a lot of the time Vavg x Iavg is basically what my PS shows but Math(avg) is showing 10watts more on my scope. Will need to figure out why, because any phase shift should show less than I*V, not sure how it would avg to more.

AlteredUnity posted this 21 July 2023

Here is a short video showing one configuration with a higher frequency as Fighter recommended, as well as higher voltage as Fighter recommended. You can see that increasing the input voltage is decreasing the input power. I wish I shown the bulb afterwards because the output increases as well. 

https://youtube.com/shorts/Xr6iIWMJsYg?feature=share8

Don't know if anyone knows the best way to solve for the phase drift at higher frequencies using a current probe, because it's clearly visible.

Fighter posted this 21 July 2023

Hi AlteredUnity,

Congratulations, so you have the input decreasing effect and the specific ZPM waveform.

This is a successful ZPM replication ! ☺️

So seems your ZPM prefers to have more voltage in order to make its coils "dance" together. That's absolutely no issue as long as the input decreasing effect is still present.

When you have some time maybe post a video showing the input decreasing effect while the bulb luminosity is increasing ? Thanks !

I uploaded your video here because right now seems we have a issue with YouTube Shorts videos. They're not working properly, I'm gonna add the issue on my ToDo list to be addressed when I'll have some time.

If you don't mind I'll change the thread's title to "AlteredUnity's successful ZPM replication", add the "BeyondUnity" tag and add it to our "Our Beyond-Unity Devices" section on the right side of the site.

Keep experimenting with your ZPM, try different parameters (duty-cycle, frequency and voltage) and you'll see you can amplify the input decreasing effect more, you just need to learn your ZPM's behavior just like I did with my ZPMs. 🙂

About the current probe issue, I don't have/use one so I can't answer to your question but maybe Jagau or YoElMiCrO can help.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
AlteredUnity posted this 22 July 2023

No problem, I like that title better, thank you! I will try to setup same configuration, I almost deleted this video from my phone for some reason to make more changes, but hopefully I will be able to remake video this weekend.

I'm familiar with delaying the probe, just didn't know if there was a better way, but worst case I'll match it to norm probe at that frequency with resistive load and adjust.

Thank you for the help and all the feed back it rly paved a simple route, though sometimes I get stuck and completely avoid the solution, hopefully I can contribute more once I get a better understanding...

Also to keep in mind, I finished rewinding my second coils so both 150t and 300t are ccw, that is what was used in last video. While I test more with this I will also try my 150t cw coil to compare results, but I feel they will be somewhat similar as i was still getting good results from that configuration though didnt see the input drop by the Watts with voltage increase...time and testing will tell.

Fighter posted this 23 July 2023

You're welcome ! ☺️

And thank you for sharing your ZPM replication !

No rush about the video, whenever you have some time, will be nice to have it here.

We know what ZPM can do, we have multiple successful replications here, but it's especially for naysayers accusing us of fake data and experiments, they're never able to argue about the input decreasing effect while the light bulbs intensity on output is increasing when they see it happening.

About my help and feedback, absolutely, I'm always trying to help when it's possible even if sometimes is difficult to come with sugestions for remote experiments just based on descriptions and photos of these experiments. 'Cause myself I can't say I know ZPM's behavior 100% so I can't come with corrections for different environments/equipments. I can't always say "if your ZPM does that we should correct/change that component"... 🙂

But that's why I made it public, did so many experiments and presented so much data - so researchers can replicate it, see what it can do, explore it and if possible contribute in enhancing it to the goal of making it self-running.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
BeyondUnity
Our Beyond-Unity Devices
Members Currently Online:

No one online at the moment

This Week's High Earners
Categories
Popular Tags
Hot Topics
Close