Replying To: Shelfordella
I'm glad you finally understood, very few did. That's what a really honest researcher should always do, check before jumping to attack. Why do you think Itsu never did this ? I'm not an expert but I asked Jagau for details and verified myself that his calculation method results match the calculator from Vishay site. Results always matched. I did that since the beginning when Jagau came with this new calculation method in our restricted area. It took me like 30 minutes to check for myself, compare this time with the weeks since Itsu kept posting attacks against the calculation method and against Jagau. Again, why do you think Itsu never even tried to check for himself (like I did) or ask real-life experts ? I tell you, because he came here with a mission. And that mission was not about replicating and evaluating ZPM, his mission was to "prove" no matter what that what we present here is false.
Most of the devices we're experimenting here have square pulses as input so this formula means a paradigm shifting for COP calculation for all these devices. What do you think now about Itsu's "methodology" ? Imagine the "experts" from overunity site used a wrong calculation method while "evaluating" their devices for 15 years. How many of the devices on their bench were actually overunity and they didn't even realized it ? š We'll never know but we can figure it out as in 15 years they never found any device to be overunity.
The same about the old aboveunity site which pretend to be "light years ahead" (in the wrong direction) and the owner did go against Jagau too. That site was light years ahead as long as we (our core team of researchers) were there and presented our experiments and moved the things forward. Since we left that site is dead in the water, the research activity is almost 0 including in the restricted area of the site (Tier II and Tier III):
That's right, the restricted areas of the old aboveunity site are not so restricted. And one don't need a user and password to access them, there are security holes which can trick the site to expose those informations to anyone knowing how to use them. The owner, (with "over 30 years of experience in IT" as he claims) has no clue about the security issues he has.
And as you can see since our team left there is almost 0 research activity. As I said, dead in the water.
But let's go back to Jagau's calculation method. I said before:
It was also verified and confirmed by other members of our core team before Jagau came public with it. Including Yoel. Jagau is a very careful researcher. He asked for double-checks here and also the experts in real life before deciding to move the info in our public section.
'Cause that's what Jagau did: before going public with this he asked for confirmations from the more advanced members in our core team and also from experts he knows in real-life. He double-checked, triple-checked, made sure he is right before going public with it. So imagine his dissapointment when instead of checking and asking others Itsu desperatly tried to "prove" it wrong. Just as he tried to "prove" that ZPM is consuming tens and tens of watts with his failed ZPM replication.
So why Jagau would waste his time trying to convince some naysayers ? He has better things to do in research.
If they get it it's fine, if they don't get it it's still fine, he will not use his time to make each naysayer understand. That's not his duty and that's not anyone's duty here.
this means negative power because current is flowing into the psu. Interesting. Probably caused by load current and mutual inductance, dunno.
That's what ZPM does. It "sees" the DC source as another load and it's sending power to it too. That's what is causing the input reduction effect.
This is not desirable when we use a DC source on input, we would want that power to actually go into the light bulbs. But this behavior could prove very desirable for future when we'll make ZPM run on battery 'cause in that situation ZPM will power the load while potentially will also recharge the battery. But that scenario still remains to be confirmed.
Despite appearances ZPM is very complex. That's why I smiled when I saw Itsu starting with this:
As Fighters device is so simple i cannot imagine that it acts like a generator
And I said to myself "the guy have no f* clue, he didn's saw all the things I saw...". š
We also don't have a very clear image of what's really happening inside this device behind what the scopes are showing to us.
In our core team we have members very advanced in physics and electronics, one of them (YoElMiCrO) have more insights and presented a very comprehensive scenario about what's happening inside ZPM. One which makes sense even for members not so advanced in physics and electronics like me.
Well, this is a long post and probably became hard to read so I'm gonna stop here.
It's just a wider view of what we're doing here and what we're dealing with.
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of
energy, frequency and
vibration." |
|
|
Nikola Tesla |
