Beyond Unity - Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module)

Admin

Fighter posted this 13 February 2023

This is the second imported thread (from the old aboveunity site) about my ZPM:

For references I will keep the original posting date for every imported post.

Note: This thread is public, everyone can see it, even the visitors which are not members here.

For the posts made by former aboveunity members which are not members on our site I'll use a member placeholder named UndisclosedMember.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

beyond-unity zpm zero-point-module

Admin

cd_sharp posted this 02 May 2020

Hey, Atti,

Nice job, I see inrush current in your setup. About the delay conduction I think using a switch instead of the slow diode gives you a lot more control. I also took a shot at TVSs, but I can say that only a part of them are truly able to conduct suddenly.

Thumbs up from me!

If you know how to build such a device and you're not sharing, you're a schmuck! - Graham Gunderson

YoElMiCrO posted this 03 June 2020

Hello everyone.

@Fighter.

If you want, try this configuration of your ZPM.

As soon as I can I explain how it works.
Thank you in advance.

YoElMiCrO.

Admin

Fighter posted this 03 June 2020

Hi YoElMiCrO,

Thanks, I'll give it a try.

So far the tests with a separate coil for primary failed, seems I'm on a wrong way.

That's why I didn't posted anything new.

When you have some time please feel free to post the explanation.

I appreciate,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

YoElMiCrO posted this 04 June 2020

Hello everyone.

@Fighter.

The best way I've ever seen to get energy from the E-field
is the previous post, testing Floyd Sweet's idea that only E remains
while we cancel H.
This is possible with the following reasoning.
Imagine that the two inductors are exactly the same
and they are in non-inductive mode, in this way the current will move
the magnetic permeability instantaneously to its highest value, this
current value will be defined mainly by the value of the placed load resistance
in the center of the inductors while the turns define the permeability for that current.
Being inductors, Faraday's laws do not apply, but Biot-Savart's laws for a field
defined B for which the magnetic permeability is maximum.
Put another way and excuse the mathematics ...

It turns out that during Ton's time the two fields collide at their center,
if we take the latter as a reference we will see the following ...
Since the two magnetic vectors are at 0, the energy expenditure
the source will only be to supply the current required by the load and only
that in theory we do not store any energy in the system.
But during Toff's time, these vectors revert to natural action
of them, (in their attempt to make the current follow the same direction) away from the center (0),
In other words…
During Ton's time the two beginnings are (+/-) and for Toff (-/+), as the current
it is maximum for the beginning of Toff and the tension increases by the induction of E
the load will see more energy during that half cycle.
You can play with the duty if you want, also with the relationships between the inductors.
Here are some images of the experiments I carry out.

The load in this case is a 6W@12Vac LED lamp.

Note:
UndisclosedMember is right about using POC, it is related to a fundamental phenomenon
that occurs in nature with or without core, but still under study.
As I commented earlier in the shortest possible time I will deal with it in this post here.

YoElMiCrO.

Admin

Fighter posted this 15 June 2020

This is as a note for myself but also for everyone who ever tried to reproduce Tom Bearden's MEG.

It also have implications on every device using "special" cores including ZPM.

Recently after I saw one of Chris' post about someone asking in private for Tom Bearden's "Energy from the Vacuum" DVDs Collection I became curious and wanted to see what those DVDs contain.

For now I only saw the first DVD from that collection and I already found out there are hidden gems on those DVDs. Really important stuff !

One of them is what I post here and it's Bearden explanation on how MEG really works. It's a paradigm-shifting video segment and I'd wish I'd saw it few years ago when I was trying to replicate MEG.

This is the video segment I'm talking about:

There are a few paradigm-changing conclusions:

1. J.L. Naudin's explanation on how MEG works is totally wrong. So this simulation is wrong:

The role of the permanent magnet is not to have his magnetic field switched to left and right core sections by the small command coils.

2. Seems that when a permanent magnet is placed inside of the core without gap so the entire magnetic flux of the permanent magnet is "sucked" inside of the core and become trapped there are two effects:

the permanent magnet become almost inert so it stops emitting magnetic field around it or (depending of how close to 0 mm is the gap between it and the core) it's emitting a very small magnetic field compared to its original magnetic field;
when the previous conditions are happening and almost all the magnetic field of the permanent magnet is trapped inside the core something new happens: outside of the core a zero-point/quantum/aether (however you call it) field is formed containing additional energy ready to be captured by our device.

3. The practical way of capturing additional energy from that new zero-point/quantum/aether field formed outside of the core is to "shake" that field by pulsing the small command coils on top of the MEG. That will make the output coils capture the additional energy contained in that field therefore zero-point energy is added to the device's output.

4. Tom says MEG's output actually contains multiple and very complex signals which our actual instruments (including the oscilloscopes) are unable or have major difficulties to analyze; he says that because of this there is very difficult to calculate the real energy from the output and expensive specialists and specialized instruments are required for calculating MEG's COP.

5. Seems COP 5 is not the limit for MEG, it can go higher but in the prototype trying to go higher would burn the output coils.

6. He's talking about "nano-crystalline material, there's 2-3 types which would do it"; Metglas AMCC core is actually amorphous metal alloy, not nano-crystalline, so I'm not sure it's one of those 2-3 types Bearden is talking about. What if it's not, what if when placing a permanent magnet inside a AMCC core the magnetic field is not "sucked" and trapped inside the core or what if that zero-point field is not forming around the core ? In my experiments I used AMCC-200 but what if, to really have that zero-point field forming around the core, a nano-crystalline core like Hitachi F3CC0125 is required ? Since seems that zero-point field forming outside of the core cannot be detected directly is difficult to verify if amorphous metal cores are able to have that effect or not. If not then I experimented for years with a wrong core so this is a important question which I have no answer for it right now.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

UndisclosedMember posted this 15 June 2020

Fighter,

Looks like that video series has a lot of hidden gems. Tom Bearden has broad shoulders for us to stand upon, with Chris encouraging us to step up.

This is exciting stuff.

A great post! Thanks!

UndisclosedMember posted this 15 June 2020

One would imagine that no special materials were created for the MEG project, but rather off-the-shelf cores were utilized.

Looking at the characteristics of Hitachi FINEMET, the saturation/permeability boundary has been exceeded.

https://www.hitachi-metals.co.jp/e/products/elec/tel/p02_21.html

-A-

UndisclosedMember posted this 15 June 2020

Hey Fighter,

There is some good data in the Videos mentioned, but also, there is some confusing data.

I think Experimental Results speak for themselves, and you have shown results consistently. One could spend a lifetime searching for the ideal Core Material, and find the first Core that was tested to be the best, that's a possibility.

The Magnetic A Vector Potential left on the Outside of the Core, is an Electric Field with Curl:

Where:

B = Magnetic Flux Phi or Φ
A = Magnetic A Vector Potential

This Magnetic A Vector Potential is only available, if one Changes the Field, if one changes the Coil Position, then this is not available. So the Magnetic Field Phi or Φ, must also be changed, because the Magnetic Field and the Magnetic A Vector Potential are part of the same thing. Magnetic Flux is both: The Magnetic A Vector Potential and Magnetic Flux Phi or Φ.

The Screen shows Flux but no Magnetic A Vector Potential. Above, Magnets in Attraction Mode.

Below, Magnets in Opposition mode:

In this experiment, Magnets are in Opposition Mode. This says a lot here! You know the Poynting Component?

When I started my public Replication, I was wrong in my initial assumptions. You can see here, my replication work.

I failed miserably, you will see comments like: "Lenz's law is a problem"...

On The MEG Thread, I explained how one day I connected the dots, and I saw the Interaction between the Two Partnered Output Coils. I saw how they Interacted, to create excessive Electromagnetic Induction.

The fact that One Partnered Output Coil had a MOV, or a conditioned Carbon Resistor, or a TVS or Transorber on it, not connected to the Output, or the Input speaks volumes:

This means, there was a timed Action Reaction Pair, the Tertiary Coil had to be assisting the Action of the Primary Coil to get a Gain on the Output.

I knew I had it right when I saw the MEG Team release the following:

Because I had seen this already, I knew it was what was necessary. Your waveform is what is necessary for your configuration! You show, clearly, that there is another method to reach the same Magnetic Resonance!

Most of all, what confirms you are on the right direction, is Your Results! So stick with your results, they guide you.

Admin

Fighter posted this 15 June 2020

@UndisclosedMember I'm not saying a special core was created for MEG, just maybe I was the one using a wrong core (amorphous) and maybe for that core the field around is not formed in that scenario as it is forming with a nano-crystalline core. About the gap, Bearden says it's not necessary to be perfect, the condition would be to have almost the entire magnetic field of the permanent magnet to be "sucked" and trapped in the core.

@UndisclosedMember a important correction, Bearden says the field formed around the core is NOT curled:

If that's true and the following phenomenon is also true

2. Seems that when a permanent magnet is placed inside of the core without gap so the entire magnetic flux of the permanent magnet is "sucked" inside of the core and become trapped there are two effects:

the permanent magnet become almost inert so it stops emitting magnetic field around it or (depending of how close to 0 mm is the gap between it and the core) it's emitting a very small magnetic field compared to its original magnetic field;

when the previous conditions are happening and almost all the magnetic field of the permanent magnet is trapped inside the core something new happens: outside of the core a zero-point/quantum/aether (however you call it) field is formed containing additional energy ready to be captured by our device.

3. The practical way of capturing additional energy from that new zero-point/quantum/aether field formed outside of the core is to "shake" that field by pulsing the small command coils on top of the MEG. That will make the output coils capture the additional energy contained in that field therefore zero-point energy is added to the device's output.

then we don't need to use energy to create two opposing magnetic fields in order to create that field surrounding the core.

The only energy we will use is the pulsed energy directed to the small command coils for making that surrounding field to pulsate.

That would be a significant decrease of the energy required on input.

So the only condition to have that surrounding field present permanently (and without any energy required) would be to find a matching permanent magnet and core able to create this phenomenon.

So if what Bearden is saying is true then we have a permanent way to convert the undetectable zero-point energy to a detectable UNCURLED potential surrounding the core without any energy costs for us. We will just just need to pulsate it and that would be the only energy cost for us.

I find this extremely interesting, at least for me it changes the entire concept of how I was thinking the MEG works !

Of course the only way to verify the validity of what Bearden says is through experimenting. I'd wish I had all this information a few years ago when I was experimenting with the MEG concept.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

UndisclosedMember posted this 16 June 2020

Hey Fighter,

Good catch My Friend!

@UndisclosedMember a important correction, Bearden says the field formed around the core is NOT curled:

When Two Forces, in our Case, M.M.F's Oppose, the Curl becomes Zero. Each Curl opposes the opposite Curl. At least this is how I understand it.

Floyd Sweet said:

Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there is no magnetic field. This is due to the superposition of the fields. However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric field surrounds it. When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.

Reference: Floyd Sweet Nothing is Something.

So, the Non-Curled Electric Field is from the Cancellation of the Curl. Curl Superposition.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend.

Attached Files

Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module) - Enhancements Stage