Beyond Unity - Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module)

Admin

Fighter posted this 13 February 2023

This is the second imported thread (from the old aboveunity site) about my ZPM:

For references I will keep the original posting date for every imported post.

Note: This thread is public, everyone can see it, even the visitors which are not members here.

For the posts made by former aboveunity members which are not members on our site I'll use a member placeholder named UndisclosedMember.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

beyond-unity zpm zero-point-module

Admin

Fighter posted this 20 December 2019

Thank you Vidura, it's good to be back 🙂

So the transformer will not be damaged if I don't short-circuit it ? It simply will not provide more than 1.5A even if ZPM temporary tries to get more ? That's a relief, I was thinking I will damage it during the experiments.

I really appreciate and I'll follow your advice.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

YoElMiCrO posted this 20 December 2019

Hola a todos. Disculpen por postear en Español. No estoy frente a un PC para utilizar GoogleTraslator. Actualmente la hipótesis sobre la región negativa de la permeabilidad magnética poco a poco se ha convertido en teoría mediante muchos experimentos. La cuestión es que necesitamos de las dos entidades para producir trabajo útil. Los núcleos de tipo Amorfo, Nanoperm, Nanocristalinos y los utilizados en el control del duty magnético serían los ideales.

YoElMiCrO posted this 20 December 2019

La cuestión es que la relación entre Br/Bs sea lo más próximo a la unidad. De esa forma aseguramos que que la energía almacenada en el inductor sea mínima y podemos comparar la extraída del medio.

Postdata. Este segundo post pertenece al anterior, solo que no se como desde el móvil se publicó y no tiene la pestaña de editar.

@Fighter, publicaré mi réplica de tu ZPM al menor tiempo posible, pues he estado súper liado en otros proyectos. De nuevo, disculpen.

Admin

Fighter posted this 20 December 2019

Hola YoElMiCrO, no se preocupe, podemos usar Google Translator. Entonces, otros experimentos confirmaron la teoría de la región negativa de la permeabilidad magnética? Eso es interesante. Siéntase libre de publicar en cualquier momento aquí.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Admin

Fighter posted this 20 December 2019

Cuando tienes tiempo, está bien. Tengo mucha curiosidad acerca de su replicación de ZPM y los resultados de las pruebas.Cuando tienes tiempo, está bien. Tengo mucha curiosidad acerca de su replicación de ZPM y los resultados de las pruebas.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

UndisclosedMember posted this 20 December 2019

I'm looking for a 1.5A current limiter so I avoid burning up the transformer, is there a simple solution for protecting it ?

Resettable polyfuses can be helpful for some situations. They can stop large surges or sustained currents over a long period of time. The cost is added resistance which will waste power. That can be a good trade off in some cases.

Admin

Fighter posted this 21 December 2019

Thank you Zanzal, I'll check for polyfuses.

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Admin

cd_sharp posted this 21 December 2019

Hey, Fighter, very good to have you back, my friend. I remind you that there is no need to measure the input. I'm convinced the ZPM is very much AU. I would put effort into making it power bigger loads. Just my opinion, I hope you don't mind.

If you know how to build such a device and you're not sharing, you're a schmuck! - Graham Gunderson

Admin

Fighter posted this 22 December 2019

Hey Cd_Sharp, thanks. No worries about your opinion, the idea is I think it should be a required step in this stage of enhancing ZPM having real-time input and output accurate readings, else I would go in blind during enhancement experiments and I wouldn't know if I'm going in the right direction or in the wrong direction.

Unfortunately after the last testings I'm not sure about the accuracy of this method of measuring input as it doesn't match the measurements made on oscilloscope, I'm adding the previously made oscilloscope measurements here for reference:

Hey Fighter,

You have my Vote!

Purely Resistive Load, no phase angle to worry about! Figures look good!

Input:

Output:

Well done! Good work Fighter!

You have "Generated" a full: ‭3.574784‬ Watts above your Input for a COP: ‭1.09396‬

and also because this customized DC source I made seems to modify the behavior of the ZPM.

I'll present the data of the latest experiments.

The customized DC source plus the measurements module are consuming about 5.3 watts.

Basically the customized DC source is consuming about 4.1 W and the measurement module about 1.2 W.

Sorry but the PeakTech energy-meter don't have display light but in the next photos is shows 227.4 V, 0.042 A, 5.2 W.

Photos:

In the next photos I show ZPM powered by the customized DC source where the probe of the oscilloscope is put directly on ZPM's output:

As you can see the measurement module shows 62.7 W, much more than the 38.04 W previously measured using the oscilloscope. Also you may notice the ZPM's specific waveform is not present, I don't recognize this waveform and it means ZPM's behavior is changed.

In the next photos I'm using exactly the same parameters I just switched to my usual DC source:

You may see the ZPM specific waveform is present again now.

In the next image you may see the different behavior when using both DC sources, on the left is the waveform when using my usual DC source (ZPM pattern is present) and on the right when using the customized DC source:

Then I placed oscilloscope's probe directly on the light bulb pins and searched for another optimum frequency and repeated the tests (with the customized DC source then with the usual DC source).

These are the images made while using the customized DC source:

And these are the images made while using the usual DC source:

As you may see it's the same changed behavior, the ZPM's specific waveform is present when using the usual DC source and it's not present when using the customized DC source.

For curiosity I wanted to see what's between the transformer and the bridge rectifier, this is what I see on oscilloscope:

As a conclusion I consider this way of real-time measuring of input a failure as it's far away from what the oscilloscope shown and also the customized DC source is modifying ZPM's behavior. Seems there is something in the usual DC source and that something is missing from my customized DC source.

Also I was thinking of other possible reasons for failure. The bridge rectifier is made for 50Hz and as we know ZPM is sending high-frequency pulsed power back which for sure rectifier's diodes are unable to block/handle. Probably that power is reaching transformer's secondary and creating magnetic field which is fighting the magnetic field of the transformer's primary. That would be a possible explanation for what the extra-watts shown by the meters.

This hypothesis may be confirmed by the fact that the bridge rectifier and transformer's core are getting hot in about 10 minutes which is strange because the transformer is rated for 1.5 A but during the tests the current used is just 0.33 A. At 0.33 A both transformer and bridge rectifier should not get that hot and that fast.

I suppose another approach is needed for real-time measurements and also I wonder what exactly is in the usual DC source and is missing in the customized DC source making ZPM to change behavior when using the customized DC source. Many new questions and hypothesis resulted from these new experiments even if they failed, I'll think about them.

As usually any suggestions are welcome... 🙂

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

UndisclosedMember posted this 22 December 2019

Hey Fighter,

An excellent post!

All AC Energy Meters especially the ones with Toroid, or Current Transformers, are no good for accurately measuring anything but the AC Voltage and Current at the specific Frequency that they are rated for.

Almost all Higher Frequencies are eliminated.

Especially Frequencies that are coming back in a much higher frequency range that the ratings are indicated.

I am sorry to let you know now about this as I see two other posts with this idea, I should have said before.

The same is true of the AC Energy Meters that you have plugged into your power board. They have a very limited bandwidth and are not accurate unless you are using the specific frequency they are rated for.

This is just one video showing how far out they can be:

Now this video does not allow for Phase Angle, being a resistive load, it will be negligible, but this is @Rated Frequency and there is a several watt discrepancy, d, there, even at a phase angle of X.

Vd = 122.7 - 120.4 = 2.3V

Id = 1.28 - 1.279 = 0.001A

Pd = ‭‭157.056‬‬ - ‭‭153.9916‬‬ = ‭3.0644‬ watts.

This is not including any phase angle there may be in there. Of course phase angle, cos(theta), may be very small due to the resistive load, with very little Capacitive / Inductive component.

@50 Hz or 60Hz they are ok, @600Khz they are hopeless.

P.S: Sorry, I see your edits, I edited also. You have a good point, we should start looking at the Input Power Circuitry also. A Battery might be a good choice for a Source as it contains no Circuitry as such?

P.P.S: The much slower speed of the E I Laminated Silicon Steel Transformer will absorb the Higher Frequencies and not respond to, in time, the Energy coming back. Turning this Energy into extra Heat. Similar to how an Induction Cooker works.

Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module) - Enhancements Stage

Input:

Output: