Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module) - Enhancements Stage

Hello,

I just want to add here my comments to some ZPM-related posts made by Atti here, here and here.

Pay attention to the details. Compare the operation of different machines.
What are the common points. 
Why the current decreases.
How does N. Tesla's transformer relate to the arrangements.
-ZPM
-Kapanadze
-Árpad Bóday
-Bulgarian M.E.G.
-T.Bearden's statement

Thank you, I feel a great honour for seeing ZPM put in the same category with Kapanadze's and Tom Bearden's devices.

Just because something doesn't work the way I expect it to doesn't mean it never will. Measurement is not always the path to salvation. 
The devil is in the details. I mean.
    If an effect is pointed out, it might work. 
(I have been greatly helped by the fighter ZPM layout. I see everyone misunderstands it and doesn't spend enough time studying it)

You're welcome. Many naysayers were suspicious as usually and made the usual "measurement errors" accusations (that's what they do when they don't understand or refuse to accept what they're seeing) which is totally ridiculous. 

Why ? Because logically it makes no sense when they consider that... 

1. the input readings are correct when ZPM is not functioning at his optimal/resonance frequency, the output light bulbs luminosity is lower and the input readings show close to 1A consumption; 
2. the input readings are incorrect when ZPM is working at its optimal/resonance frequency, the output light bulbs luminosity is increasing and the input readings are decreasing to ~10mA consumption.

But naysayers' "opinion" doesn't matter and never did, when our members replicated ZPM they saw with their own eyes what ZPM does and presented their ZPM replications here.

I think that the part of society that wants to make some progress in their lives will find a place here. If you speak in a human way.

Thank you. Yes, that's why we built our own home here. Away from cult-like attitude and the mentally-ill owner of the old aboveunity site, away from the naysayers populating other sites where they just can't wait to jump with their usual "measurement errors" conclusion to anyone trying to present any "exotic" device and results on their sites.

The biggest problem in our world is that everyone wants to win on this field. Especially on the material side. Money, power, glory. Forever. Not to experience spiritually. 

Agree. But in my case I'm not in this for any of these. The reasons I'm in this kind of research are detailed in my first post I've made when I presented ZPM to the public.

I presented from the start all the data I had about my ZPM: coils configurations and characteristics, the core and its specs, how to build it, how to tune it and what it does.

Someone who wants money and power doesn't do that. And if we look into history of this kind of technologies we can see that anyone wanting to get money and power from this technology by producing these devices comercially ended dead or blocked through various methods by the Big-Oil cartels.

About glory, no thank you, we have buffoons on other sites claiming they're the saviors of the humankind, sent by God to lead the humanity to a new era, etc. That's f* ridiculous.

All I want is to have free energy available for every house on this planet and to end the humankind's slavery imposed by the Big-Oil cartels for at least 100 years. If, when my time will come to leave, I will see this technology available to everyone on this planet, I will leave smiling because I know I contributed to that liberation of the humankind.

All the "glory" I've got was to receive "friendly" warnings that I better stop doing this kind of research and make it public, I had strange "coincidences" happening around and so on. About some of them I did spoke, about others I didn't. But I know these things happened and are happening to others who stepped in and made public this kind of tech and devices.

The only thing I don't like is to see others trying to claim credits about the research and development of ZPM. Or worse than that, accusing me of stealing from them.

Why ? Because when I did that kind of research and development they were not here working with me, experimenting, trying different devices and configurations until I came with what we all know as ZPM.

They didn't worked with me on all these (just a few examples from many):

You want to see just a few samples from ZPM's origin and development ?

So tell me where was that loser when I did all these so he is trying now to get credit for my work and he's accusing me that I stolen from him ?!

You thought ZPM appeared from nowhere, I just built it and it worked ? You have no idea...

The only one I was communicating with during ZPM's research and development, exchanging experiments' results and ideas on our now secondary/backup forum was Cd_Sharp.

Then Cd_Sharp asked me to go to the old aboveunity forum and disclose ZPM to the public.

At that time it was obvious the cuckoo-boy had no f* idea what ZPM is and what it does. Even if lately he tried to claim credits for ZPM or even accused me of stealing from him. Stealing what ? I presented a functional device which members of our team here replicated while after more than 7 years he is still struggling to show how his "wonderful" coils work and he is unable to show any functional demo device.

So, as I said, the only thing I don't like is to see others trying to claim credits about the research and development of ZPM.

You may say it's about ego. I say no, it's about fairness and about recognizing someone's work and contribution to this domain.

Regards,

Fighter